7 results for “Supreme Court”
Parliament will test whether the new tribunals bill truly fixes independence concerns or merely repackages them.
Tribunal appointments and independence have been a recurring institutional fight; this bill could either stabilize the system or reopen old concerns.
Parliament will face fresh scrutiny over whether the tribunals bill truly protects judicial independence.
Tribunals handle a large share of specialized disputes, so the appointment and oversight structure matters for both speed and independence. This bill will be watched as a test of whether the government can fix the system without reintroducing the same constitutional problems.
The Kullu probe will intensify if the Supreme Court presses for the missing FIR and asks why transfers replaced enforcement.
This is a sharp institutional embarrassment for the state and could become a broader test of enforcement in tourist districts.
The EC’s removal rule will stay contested, and Maharashtra’s voter-roll cleanup will sharpen the next political fight.
This is a major institutional clash over the rules of political survival in office. The Maharashtra voter-roll revision adds a second layer of electoral sensitivity and could intensify opposition scrutiny.
The new birthright-citizenship orders will be challenged quickly in court, with the administration’s focus on birth tourism becoming the key legal test.
The move is designed to force a new legal lane around an issue the White House has not been able to settle. It will likely trigger immediate litigation and keep immigration policy at the center of Trump’s domestic agenda.
The Supreme Court will push the NDPS issue toward procedural reform, with forensic timelines and seizure rules likely to become the center of the Monday hearing and follow-up orders.
If the court entertains even part of this plea, it could reshape narcotics enforcement practice across India. The proposal is unusually operational: deadlines, evidence handling, and asset seizure, not just rhetoric.
The Maharashtra government will face pressure to revise its private-forest claims process quickly, and the 184 petitions are likely to trigger more title challenges in Raigad, Pune and Thane.
This is a major land-rights and regulatory story with immediate implications for property titles, development projects and litigation risk across Maharashtra. The court’s language suggests the state may have to revisit its approach.
You're all caught up · last 5 days